I could not believe the High Line didn't win..A lot of the US teams were same ones as usual - Warren Byrd in Virginia, Wlm. McDonough, Val Valkenburg and Oehme Van Sweden....Some good new names, though.. - oh, yeah, the Beirut one was exciting..Why is china winning? What do you think? Better computer graphics? (no, I'm not snarky! :)
Reply by Nick Aceto on May 4, 2010 at 11:57am
I just noticed that all three projects recognize a partnership between Turenscape and Peking University. What's up with that? I thought professional awards were for professional projects? So can MVVA partner with GSD and win an award next year?
Otherwise, I think the projects are good. They offer a bit of change from the usual, though I think ASLA has a tendencey toward the academic, of which I think those projects fit well. They also all sort of have the same theme dont they?
Permalink Reply by howl 1 day ago
Kongjian Yu is the chair of Turenscape as well as the head of school of landscape architecture in Peking University.
I’m personally quite happy to see more non-American projects winning this reward, ASLA has been dominated by "American Style" since long ago. On the one hand, as an American based organization of course it should focus on domestic projects more; on the other, in a time when globalization effectively shapes landscape designs all over the world and makes them look more and more similar or just simply "American-like", as one of the most influential LA awards in the world, ASLA may also need to think beyond "community, ecology and delight".
Every year's award winning designs undoubtedly influence the aesthetic of the world-wide profession and therefore indirectly transfer the land around people.
American-centrism or Cultural Diversity ?
I think this year's ASLS awards give a strong and thoughtful answer!
Permalink Reply by Nick Aceto 1 day ago
So it would be Ok for the chair of Harvard GSD to enter an academic project? Maybe this has already been done?
I know that the awards jury reviews projects anonymously, but I would think it would seem pretty obvious to me if I were on the jury the geographic location of these projects. Are these really The Best or is there some agenda or 'cultural sway' evidenced here?
With rampant job loss here in the states, there has been much talk of work overseas, particularly in China and Asia. What kind of message is this sending the global community, using student talent in professional work? Especially when the issue of unemployment and unpaid internships is coming to a head here in the U.S.?